top of page

Bond Strength and Yield: Engineering Stability into Every Frame

  • Writer: Davide
    Davide
  • Sep 16
  • 2 min read

Bond strength isn’t a constant—it’s the outcome of surface prep, material control, and the process environment. When failures occur, they’re often rooted in overlooked details like surface contamination or subtle process drifts.




Identifying the Variables

Not all contamination is consistent. Parts coming into the plasma chamber often carry different levels and types of residues. If your process applies the same plasma exposure across all input types, it may not be powerful enough to remove contamination variability.


This is why plasma cleaning consistency matters. A robust, repeatable process ensures that no matter what enters the chamber—lightly contaminated or heavily so—the output is a surface ready to bond.

Why Failures Persist

Inconsistent pull-force measurements, wire bonding performance issues, or occasional non-stick events? These symptoms are usually signs that either:


  1. The cleaning process isn’t removing all contaminants

  2. There’s a process drift due to hardware degradation

  3. Materials or machines further down the line are introducing unexpected variability

Diagnosing the Real Cause

One of the first checks should be a machine health check. A small oxygen leak or a pressure imbalance inside the plasma chamber can undermine your entire cleaning cycle. What looks like a material failure could simply be a plasma system calibration issue.


The second variable is materials—especially wires. Ensure your wire stock is consistent, and from a single, verified supplier. Even small deviations in wire surface condition can affect bonding behaviour.


The third? Your bonding equipment. Verify the bonder is operating to spec, and that alignment, force, and heat parameters haven’t drifted over time.

Towards Deterministic Output

Your goal isn’t just clean surfaces. It’s deterministic cleaning—a system that guarantees reliable outputs regardless of variable inputs.

This means building a plasma process reliability model that treats worst-case contamination as standard. If your chamber can handle the dirtiest frame, it can handle anything. This shifts the process from reactive to proactive.

And in production, that shift matters. Because unexpected failures aren’t just technical issues—they’re yield losses, downtime events, and delivery threats.

Complex Systems, Subtle Failures

Modern production lines are interconnected webs of processes and suppliers. One misalignment—ten steps earlier—can trigger a failure in bonding much later. And often, that variable still falls within the spec sheet.

That’s why debugging bonding defects is so difficult. You might spend days tracking down a 2% deviation in a vendor's lot that caused a cascade of subtle changes in yield.


Yet, every minute the line is down is a loss. Teams running at 100% capacity can’t afford reactive maintenance. They need tools that ensure production yield optimisation up front.

Process-Controlled Bonding

The answer is tight control over the surface preparation stage. Plasma isn’t just a cleaner—it’s a process gatekeeper.


By defining robust cleaning parameters, monitoring gas composition, and verifying chamber health, you remove key failure modes before they propagate. This leads to:


  • Fewer bonding rejections

  • More consistent pull test values

  • Stable interfacial adhesion

  • Reduced scrap rates

In short: bonding defect reduction that sticks.

Final Thought: Control What You Can

You can’t control every variable in your supply chain. But you can control the surface preparation step—and that gives you leverage across the rest.

Want help tuning your plasma setup to build in stability? Talk to us. We’ll help you clean for yield, not just cleanliness.



 
 
 
bottom of page